I was interviewed by KPRC yesterday evening about the latest seep discovered close to the well and the growing rift between BP and the US government. I can't embed it, so here's the link.
Bob on NBC Affiliate KPRC Houston, July 18, 2010
Categories:
3 Comments
Leave a comment
Featured
Follow us on Twitter
The Hall of Fame Index
Who should be in the baseball Hall of Fame? Find out in The Hall of Fame Index
Find us on Facebook
Disaster on the Horizon
Bob's new book, Disaster on the Horizon, is now available on Amazon. Coming shortly to your favorite local bookseller.
Tag Cloud
Recent Comments
- lomamonster commented on PolitiFact New Jersey | Chris Christie slams health care reform as "a government takeover of health care": With Perry
- Shortstuff commented on Breaking Down the Job Market: Congratula
- Shortstuff commented on The Difference Between Occupy and the Tea Party: Y'all are
- lomamonster commented on A Wrist Slap for Citigroup: Ah! And t
- cobbo commented on A Wrist Slap for Citigroup: Remember t
- Scott Barzilla commented on Herman Cain's 9-9-9 Plan in One (Really Long) Graph: Come on pe
- lomamonster commented on A Wrist Slap for Citigroup: If were ar
- lomamonster commented on A Wrist Slap for Citigroup: Des, I'm a
- Desperado commented on A Wrist Slap for Citigroup: I'm with y
- carguy commented on A Wrist Slap for Citigroup: I won't ho
Blogroll
- FOK News Channel (Keith Olbermann's Blog)
- Daily Kos Gulf Watchers
- Crooks and Liars
- The Daily Beast
- FiveThirtyEight
- Juanita Jean's The World's Most Dangerous Beauty Salon
- Talking Points Memo DC
- MediaMatters
- Brad Blog
- Orcinus
- Wonkette
- First Read
- Pollster
- Talking Points Memo
- The Huffington Post
- Newshounds
- Here's What I Think
- Donklephant
- They gave us a republic
- Politico
- The Moderate Voice
Guest Bloggers
Recent Entries
- PolitiFact New Jersey | Chris Christie slams health care reform as "a government takeover of health care"
- By Bob Cavnar | Comments (1)
- A Wrist Slap for Citigroup
- By Desperado | Comments (9)
- Breaking Down the Job Market
- By Scott Barzilla | Comments (2)
- Herman Cain's 9-9-9 Plan in One (Really Long) Graph
- By Desperado | Comments (6)
- The Next Bailout?
- By Desperado | Comments (4)
- The Difference Between Occupy and the Tea Party
- By Desperado | Comments (11)
- A Report From Occupy Houston
- By Neil Aquino | Comments (1)
- I Need A Haircut
- By Neil Aquino | Comments (0)
- The Fight for Equality from MLK to Occupy Wall Street | this small planet
- By Bob Cavnar | Comments (0)
- Ghetto Physics
- By Voice | Comments (1)
Categories
- 2008 Election (7)
- 2012 Election (17)
- Abortion (6)
- Barack Obama (168)
- Bill White (8)
- Blogs (42)
- Campaign Finance (9)
- Childhood Obesity (4)
- Clinton (8)
- Congress (174)
- Conservatives (210)
- Cooking (1)
- Debt Limit (12)
- Economy (200)
- Education (89)
- Election 2008 (47)
- Election Politics (89)
- Eliminationist (1)
- Energy (233)
- Environment (37)
- Fox News (70)
- Free Speech (21)
- Funny (12)
- Gay Rights (2)
- George W. Bush (39)
- Great Lives (3)
- Haiti Earthquake (3)
- Health Care (197)
- Houston (64)
- Hurricane Ike (2)
- Hurricane Irene (5)
- Issue Framing (102)
- John McCain (6)
- Keith Olbermann (19)
- Kennedy (9)
- McCain (43)
- Media (103)
- Music (25)
- Occupy Wall Street (3)
- Politics (676)
- Progressives (59)
- Racism (64)
- Religion (49)
- Religious Right (40)
- Republicans (16)
- Rick Perry (3)
- Right Wing Extremism (12)
- Sarah Palin (63)
- Science (13)
- Social Justice (3)
- Taxes (22)
- Tea Party (11)
- Terrorism (61)
- Texas (92)
- Uncategorized (295)
- Union Busting (5)
- Video Entries (19)
- Voting (34)
- White Supremacists (16)
- global warming (7)
- hate speech (68)
- technology (1)
- this small planet (8)
Monthly Archives
- October 2011 (33)
- September 2011 (45)
- August 2011 (50)
- July 2011 (57)
- June 2011 (48)
- May 2011 (54)
- April 2011 (64)
- March 2011 (55)
- February 2011 (53)
- January 2011 (67)
- December 2010 (71)
- November 2010 (54)
- October 2010 (47)
- September 2010 (63)
- August 2010 (104)
- July 2010 (97)
- June 2010 (91)
- May 2010 (86)
- April 2010 (56)
- March 2010 (45)
- February 2010 (35)
- January 2010 (65)
- December 2009 (69)
- November 2009 (79)
- October 2009 (85)
- September 2009 (93)
- August 2009 (95)
- July 2009 (15)
- June 2009 (27)
- May 2009 (33)
- April 2009 (33)
- March 2009 (27)
- February 2009 (21)
- January 2009 (38)
- December 2008 (30)
- November 2008 (34)
- October 2008 (46)
- September 2008 (43)
- August 2008 (47)
- July 2008 (22)
- June 2008 (27)
- May 2008 (32)
- April 2008 (34)
- March 2008 (37)
They had it right on the webcast when they said there's a disconnect between government authorities and BP representatives.
Moreover, the information in the past few days from BP has changed dramatically, without question from the press. And there's still no announcement that the relief well effort has resumed.
Carol Browner told the CBS "Early Show" the seep was found less than two miles from the well site. Another shoe dropped by a public servant. Vague statements like this sure stoke a lot of uncertainty.
If Browner means just a little less than 2 miles away, then I'm not that concerned, it's likely just a natural seep not connected with the blowout. On the other hand, does BP have the capacity to regularly scan a bit less than 4 square miles of sea floor every few days? Or were they just really lucky to have an ROV looking at the right place at the right time? Maybe when Browner says less than 2 miles she means a lot less than 2 miles? 100 meters is technically less than 2 miles. That wouldn't technically be a lie, it would just be very imprecise - and maybe there is cause for greater concern that the gas seep and the blowout are indeed linked. So what has Browner really told me? Next to nothing.
All this could be avoided if just a minimum amount of background info was provided with these pronouncements: the basic 5 Ws of good reporting. If an interviewee doesn't provide them, then the interviewer ought to dig them out in follow-up, but as you have experienced, follow-up is often not allowed.
All of which is why I keep reading this fine little blog and why I give you regular thumbs up to let you know that good investigative reporting is appreciated.
Bob, I hope you will answer this question for all of us: The comments from you and several bloggers imply that BP is allowed, per its lease, to withhold data from the feds so that their competitors can't get at it, and that they have not been required to reveal all of their data to the Coast Guard. Do I have this right? Can you be more specific about the nature of this data?