All Things Considered, Some Significant Financial Reform

| 14 Comments
The No-Nos kicked it up a notch yesterday with House Minority Leader Boner Boehner calling for repeal of financial reform--before it even passed:

"House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters, "I think it ought to be repealed. There are common sense things that you should do to plug the holes in the regulatory system that were there, and to bring more transparency to financial transactions, because transparency is like sunlight. Sunlight is the best disinfectant."

Here's a surprise, Boehner doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. The financial reform bill passed yesterday isn't the sweeping re-structuring of the system passed in the 1930's, but in today's political climate it's about the best that we could get. And FDR wasn't dealing with opposition in Congress whose objective was to see the economy get worse in order to improve their political fortunes, like Boehner, McConnell et al are doing today.

Boehner and the Republicans are always screaming "read the bill." If they followed their own advice here's what they would find:  

* The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will have an independent director [hopefully Elizabeth Warren] and independent authority to write and enforce rules barring unfair and deceptive financial practices.

* The law puts an end to "liar loans" that require no documentation of ability to repay the loan. It bans so-called "steering payments," handed to brokers who persuaded borrowers to take out more expensive loans than the ones they qualified for.

* The bill restricts the amount of trading a bank can do with taxpayer-backed funds, a reform known as the Volcker Rule. A last-minute compromise allows banks to trade three percent of such capital, but regulators have authority to restrict such trading if it appears to be purely speculative or poses a risk to the bank.

* The bill grants broad new authorities to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, led by Gary Gensler, the administration's fiercest champion of reform... Not only did it get the lion's share of authority over derivatives, but it also gained additional authority to police fraud, manipulation and abuse.

Also on derivatives:

"The bill establishes record-keeping and reporting requirements for most derivatives. It also establishes a registered derivatives exchange and requires all of these derivatives to be submitted for clearance on an exchange."

The big banks aren't broken up, but:

"The bill establishes an intricate series of provisions to place ailing financial institutions and systemically significant nonbank financial companies into receivership. The bill also has provisions allowing the government to deal with systemically significant foreign firms and foreign financial subsidiaries of American companies. Had these provisions existed, the government could have dealt effectively with the disastrous problems at the American International Group, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers."

All in all, and considering the united opposition from Republicans and Wall Street lobbyists who were working against any reform, I'd call that quite an accomplishment. It's not perfect, but it does at least, to use a term from the health care debate, bend the curve back toward  regulation of the financial system and away from the culture of completely free markets that led us to the brink of collapse in 2008.

14 Comments

"Sunlight is the best disinfectant." I'm guessing Orange Julius knows a thing or two about sunlight...

"What EVERYONE should know who has an interest in the integrity of our financial system" ...

We know who that just knocked out of any future conversation - the party of NO.

What is being missed here (because you certainly won't hear from it from some "news" sources) is that this Congress and Obama is compiling a fairly decent legislative record. While all of the bills passed don't have the teeth we would like, it is something.

What EVERYONE should know who has an interest in the integrity of our financial system is this: The bill gives federal agencies (mostly the Federal Reserve) the authority to adopt rules to implement the law. The question is whether the FED will have the backbone to do what is needed after the spotlight of public and Congressional attention switches to some other crisis.

Orange face, hollow head. Yep, sounds like a jack-o-lantern to me.

Boehner is in serious danger of becoming someone's jack-o-lantern this fall. He is such an unattractive shade of orange.

I guess 400% annual interest is okay. From a WSJ article:

"To win broader support, Democrats softened the bill's impact on community banks, auto dealers, and small payday lenders and check cashers."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703615104575328020013164184.html

Fairly disgusting, I'd say. Although some states appear to be trying to regulate them, allowing them only 300%. WTF?

Some Houston used car dealers charge buyers with low-incomes 33% interest on car loans. An earlier article in the paper said they were very concerned that the new legislation would prohibit them from "serving" their customers. How can "serving" them in that way even be legal before the new legislation?

How does a low-income person ever get out from under?

In Boehner's case, looks aren't deceiving. This is your brain on too many ultraviolet rays.

Bobo, I think it is also the payday lenders. The saying is "The bigger the U.S. Flag displayed, the bigger the fraud." That seems to apply to a lot of the self-described patriots.

Especially around Military bases...interesting statement and without a doubt true. At one point I had the urge to drive my 'new' car through a front door.

I agree, this is a real accomplishment in today's political world.

And yes, let's hope Elizabeth Warren will lead the consumer agency. She's terrific.

I do wish that car dealers had been included in the regulation. It many parts of the country, especially around military bases, those people are like sharks -- but I demean sharks. However, they were able to lobby themselves out.

I heard last night that the legislation leaves many, many details to be worked out by the regulatory agencies, that Congress didn't get too specific. Leaving it to more expert folks sounds good. I just hope it doesn't give more room to the lobbyists.

All in all, though, this is good.

Boner, that is...

I really was starting to get the impression (watching him pontificate) that he DOESN'T know what he's talking about. He has a vacuous look that bespeaks of raw stupidity.

Half a loaf is better than no loaf.

Leave a comment

Featured

Follow us on Twitter

The Hall of Fame Index

Who should be in the baseball Hall of Fame? Find out in The Hall of Fame Index

Disaster on the Horizon

Bob's new book, Disaster on the Horizon, is now available on Amazon. Coming shortly to your favorite local bookseller.

Guest Bloggers

Recent Entries